<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--PATCHINFO id="f1b37f540eaf51ec58278ffd7c2cf2c7"!-->
<patch
    xmlns="http://novell.com/package/metadata/suse/patch"
    xmlns:yum="http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/common"
    xmlns:rpm="http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/rpm"
    xmlns:suse="http://novell.com/package/metadata/suse/common"
    patchid="sledp1o-qscintilla-2961"
    timestamp="1177693822"
    engine="1.0">
  <yum:name>sledp1o-qscintilla</yum:name>
  <summary lang="en">Optional update for qscintilla</summary>
  <summary lang="de">Optional update for qscintilla</summary>
  <description lang="en">SLE10 SP1 Update for qscintilla qscintilla

added (subpackage of) qscintilla:
-------------------------------
* Wed Jan 25 2006 - mls@suse.de
- converted neededforbuild to BuildRequires

* Mon Sep 19 2005 - joe@suse.de
- update to version 1.6 (Scintilla 1.65 based)

* Wed Sep 29 2004 - joe@suse.de
- update to version 1.4 (Scintilla 1.61 based); if I don't
  get it wrong the naming scheme used by SUSE has been
  wrong, with Scintilla and qscintilla versions being mixed
  up.

* Tue May 11 2004 - adrian@suse.de
- update to version 1.60 (Scintilla 1.3 based)

* Sat Jan 10 2004 - adrian@suse.de
- build as user

* Sun Aug 17 2003 - adrian@suse.de
- update to version 1.54 (Scintilla 1.2 based now)

* Wed May 28 2003 - adrian@suse.de
- fix symlink

* Mon May 26 2003 - adrian@suse.de
- update to version 1.53 (Scintilla 1.1 based now)

* Fri May 23 2003 - adrian@suse.de
- fix symlink

* Fri May 02 2003 - adrian@suse.de
- update to version 1.52

* Mon Mar 10 2003 - ro@suse.de
- fix build on lib64 for real

* Mon Feb 24 2003 - ro@suse.de
- fix lib64 issue

* Fri Jan 31 2003 - adrian@suse.de
- initial package, version 1.49

-------------------------------


</description>
  <description lang="de">SLE10 SP1 Update for qscintilla qscintilla

added (subpackage of) qscintilla:
-------------------------------
* Wed Jan 25 2006 - mls@suse.de
- converted neededforbuild to BuildRequires

* Mon Sep 19 2005 - joe@suse.de
- update to version 1.6 (Scintilla 1.65 based)

* Wed Sep 29 2004 - joe@suse.de
- update to version 1.4 (Scintilla 1.61 based); if I don't
  get it wrong the naming scheme used by SUSE has been
  wrong, with Scintilla and qscintilla versions being mixed
  up.

* Tue May 11 2004 - adrian@suse.de
- update to version 1.60 (Scintilla 1.3 based)

* Sat Jan 10 2004 - adrian@suse.de
- build as user

* Sun Aug 17 2003 - adrian@suse.de
- update to version 1.54 (Scintilla 1.2 based now)

* Wed May 28 2003 - adrian@suse.de
- fix symlink

* Mon May 26 2003 - adrian@suse.de
- update to version 1.53 (Scintilla 1.1 based now)

* Fri May 23 2003 - adrian@suse.de
- fix symlink

* Fri May 02 2003 - adrian@suse.de
- update to version 1.52

* Mon Mar 10 2003 - ro@suse.de
- fix build on lib64 for real

* Mon Feb 24 2003 - ro@suse.de
- fix lib64 issue

* Fri Jan 31 2003 - adrian@suse.de
- initial package, version 1.49

-------------------------------


</description>
  <yum:version ver="2961" rel="0"/>
  <rpm:requires>
    <rpm:entry kind="atom" name="qscintilla" epoch="0" ver="1.65" rel="14.4.1" flags="EQ"/>
  </rpm:requires>
  <category>optional</category>
  <atoms>
    <package xmlns="http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/common" type="rpm">
      <name>qscintilla</name>
      <arch>i586</arch>
      <version epoch="0" ver="1.65" rel="14.4.1"/>
      <checksum type="sha" pkgid="YES">37d5612895dd9e4a2e44fa02c990294a619d4b1b</checksum>
      <time file="1179500280" build="1177693822"/>
      <size package="596677" installed="3465586" archive="3485216"/>
      <location xml:base="media://#1" href="suse/i586/qscintilla-1.65-14.4.1.i586.rpm"/>
      <format>
        <rpm:requires>
          <rpm:entry kind="package" name="qscintilla" epoch="0" ver="1.65" rel="14.4.1" flags="GE"/>
        </rpm:requires>
      </format>
      <pkgfiles xmlns="http://novell.com/package/metadata/suse/patch">
      </pkgfiles>
    </package>
  </atoms>
</patch>
